Scientists studying mass graves of the time have made some interesting discoveries about Black Death victims of the middle ages. One of the best-kept secrets of historic archeology is the almost complete neglect of human remains. An enormous amount of information can be gleaned from skeletal analysis: demographics, diet and disease, migration patterns, even a surprising amount of life history. Yet time and again you'll find no mention whatever of such examinations. As an undergraduate, I and a few of my fellow anthropology majors took some classical studies courses. Time and again we were surprised that some of the best-known archeology sites were known to have substantial human remains which had never been studied. It would seem that, twenty years later, nothing much has changed. The thesis potential alone is staggering, let alone what contributions could be made to general knowledge.
I guess it just takes getting someone to open up the bone boxes.
Via Instapundit.
Actually, that's a good thing--because you can imagine the messed up train-wreck of remains there'd be of various gravesites if this type of archaeological/anthropological research had been commonplace while forensic science was still in its infancy!!!
Instead, now you have more or less pristine sites--graverobbers excluded--just begging to be analyzed....assuming the researchers have a stomach for it, that is.
Posted by: Mark on January 31, 2008 01:17 PMIt's usually not that gross. Almost all burials more than a century old will be completely skeletonized. Now, forensic cases, that's a whole different ball o' goo!
Posted by: scott on January 31, 2008 01:51 PMtrue. I was thinking more along the lines of digging up your great-great-grandpappy...