While, in my own opinion, asking is environmentalism a new religion is sort of like asking if the Pope is Polish German, it's always nice to see a new take on the stance. This time, the article profiles the author of a book which takes on climate modelers, who's models disagree so frequently and wildly that when they do actually agree, "it says more about the self-regulating group psychology of the modelling community than it does about global warming and the economy."
Via Siflay.
I've heard a number of folks who disagree with the models. Is he pointing towards the fact that the models are being developed with a particular result in mind and that results that don't agree are changed until they do?
Posted by: ron on February 14, 2007 07:47 PM