Of course the NY Times would call it an insurgent washing machine.
Note: Disturbing only if you have an appliance fetish, but there is a lot of whooping and swearing. Probably should turn the sound down if that sort of thing would get you in trouble.
Old and busted, Ron. The new hotness is "George Bush doesn't care about washing machines."
DAMMIT - missed that one.
Wow - now that I'm messing up cliches and the like, I know what it's like to be old. Like Scott.
hehehehe
Posted by: ronaprhys on October 13, 2005 06:38 PMEh? Wha? Hey!!!
C'mere you... I have this small vaguely pineapple-shaped thing I need to give you. Oh hang on, lemme take that tacky pin-thing out of the top. Seeya!
(Old age, treachery, etc.)
Posted by: scott on October 13, 2005 06:41 PMThat's what you get for not posting the link to the entire page of Dallas Cowboy smiley faces.
See, there are consequences for breaking the rules. Realize that I don't make the rules, I just have to enforce them. Kinda like that one about the only way to get Mardi Gras beads. It's rules like this that hold the fabric of society together. In fact, you should thank me.
Posted by: ronaprhys on October 13, 2005 06:46 PMYou know, that's the real reason why we should fear activist judges. They may not have the authority to make the rules, but they're now stretching "interpretation" to the point that they're enforcing laws directly against the vote of the people, even reversing their own previous rulings to do so.
Laws without enforcement are just words on paper. Enforcement without laws is rule by fiat. Congress needs to start smacking the judiciary's wrists, and soon.