Desmond Morris does a nice job of articulating some of the deeper implications of the recent hominid discovery in this op-ed:
These hunters existed as recently as 12,000 years ago and, who knows, living groups of them may still be lingering on in odd corners even today.This is shattering news and will create fascinating problems for both political and religious leaders.
Suppose for a moment that a living tribe of these beings is discovered, how should they be treated?
Are they merely advanced apes, or are they miniature humans?
If there are any left, I imagine they'll be found in the next few years. Nobody thought to actually look for strange humanoids in the manifold islands of Indonesia, but now that we know there's a possiblity... well, let's just say we didn't take over the planet because we sucked at hunting.
All this time I thought the world's cultural shatterpoint would be when the first real flying saucer's ramp hit the ground. I had no idea it could be hiding somewhere in an east-Asian jungle.
Lots of absolutely fascinating links to this story in a google search. Lots more interesting and fun than what is going on around us right now.
Posted by: Pat on November 1, 2004 03:36 PMWell, Sparky does need to work a bit on his science - Darwin's theories don't destroy the soul/human argument. All they do is explain how changing phenotypes occur without a changing genotype. He didn't realize this at the time, nor did most people until the advent of modern molecular genetics. Even then, modern genetics don't prove that we don't have souls. They don't even to try to address this sort of thing.
That and try to convince Amber or Ellen that their kitties don't have souls. I think Desmond might wake up in the wrong end of a very deep lake...
Posted by: Ron on November 1, 2004 04:46 PM