Just when I thought all media is hopelessly mired in election-time shennanigans, they go and write something interesting and important:
In the first comprehensive examination of which illnesses are driving an unprecedented rise in medical expenditures, Emory University health economist Kenneth E. Thorpe tracked 370 conditions and found that 15 accounted for 56 percent of the $200 billion rise in health spending between 1987 and 2000.
...
By documenting the most costly conditions, Thorpe's findings offer the beginnings of a road map for controlling health costs. At the same time, they suggest that in some cases, the increased spending has resulted not only in better health but also in long-term savings.
We can't start saving money until we know what we're spending it on, no?
From my point of view a huge amount of our health care dollar is spent during the last few weeks of life. We can't seem to accept death as the final chapter of life and let go. Of course I blame this on the doctors, at least in the VA systerm. I don't know what it is like out in the "real world" but what we do to keep people alive past all reason just makes me want to scream and throw things.
Posted by: Pat on August 26, 2004 08:33 AMPat - the same occurs in the civilian world as well. The standard statistic that I hear is 60% of the entire healthcare cost of a person's life will be spent in the last 6 weeks or so.
However, we need to look past just the dollars and see some of the contributing causes. While it's true that we don't accept death well, where did that come from? Maybe I'm cynical, but in America, if there's no profit from it, we'd let the person pass away much sooner. So, I look at two sources - medical 'stuff' manufacturers (both equipment and pharmaceuticals) and trial lawyers. One comes out with some new device that will potentially help hold off death. A hospital doesn't use it. Said hospital gets a multi-million dollar lawsuit, which it looses (even though the subject might have only hung on for another week - and even that would have been pain-filled or they might not have even known they were there). Then, to prevent further cases, they buy the new product and start using it.
Does this mean I'm all for letting people just die when things get expensive? No, however, if things progress to the point where there is no justifiable hope, maybe it's time to surrender to the inevitable.
Posted by: Ron on August 27, 2004 08:34 AM