Bias? We don't see no stinkin' bias:

• Panel Finds No Qaeda-Iraq Tie; Describes a Wider Plot for 9/11 (New York Times)
• No Signs of Iraq-Al Qaeda Ties Found (LA Times)
• Al Qaeda-Hussein Link Is Dismissed (Washington Post)

Really? No, not really:

The celebration [by opponents of the Iraq war] is premature. The commission's cursory treatment of so salient a national question as whether al Qaeda and Iraq confederated is puzzling [...] More to the point, though, the staff statements released Wednesday — which seemed to be contradicted by testimony at the public hearing within minutes of their publication — raise more questions than they answer, about both matters the staff chose to address and some it strangely opted to omit.

"Wow," I can hear the Peanut Gallery thinking, "couldn't you do any better than the obviously far-right National Review?"

Well, seeing as how I cited three far-left sources first, I figured I'd need to put in a little balance.